.jpg)
I don’t think that there is much doubt that many of the people who support Israel (especially in India) are primarily motivated by anti-Muslim prejudice.
They know virtually nothing about the conflict in the Middle East. And even if they did it would make very little difference.
Such is their bigotry when it comes to Islam that anyone who fights Muslims becomes their favourite.
This prejudice helps explain why, after years of supporting the Palestinian cause, Indians have become more pro Israeli over the last decade. It cannot be a coincidence that the rise in support for Israel has paralleled the rise in support for Hindutva-type causes.
But over the last year, I have begun to ask myself if a similar global shift has taken place on the liberal side as well. Are we now in a situation where liberals (and, in the Indian context, secular liberals) have got so used to seeing Muslims in the Middle East as victims that we are unwilling to condemn violent behaviour that is beyond the pale?
I find it impossible to defend what Israel has done to civilians in Gaza; the destruction, the bombings, the deaths, the enforced starvation etc. are horrifying.
But equally, can anyone defend what Hamas did on October 7 two years ago? To see that terror attack in context, try and imagine that it had happened in Pahalgam. Suppose the terrorists had raped women, shot videos of those rapes and made them public. Suppose that they had taken women, children and babies hostage and dragged them across the border to be kept in dark tunnels to be used as bargaining chips to get terrorists released from jail. Suppose over 800 civilians had been massacred, many of them while they were watching a music festival.
How would we have felt?
I have enough faith in India to believe that we would not have launched the kind of excessive retaliation that Israel chose. But I think we would have expected the world to agree with us that this was a crime against humanity.
|
"The revolts in Iran are too massive to be ignored. But you have to ask yourself: why did it take so long?"
|
And yet I find that so many liberals are unwilling to offer more than a few token words of condemnation. Hamas still glories in that slaughter but bizarrely some liberals still refuse to condemn Hamas and treat this murderous terrorism and mass rape as a legitimate part of a freedom fight. As terrible and indiscriminately violent as Israel’s response was, the bombings may have ended if Hamas had offered to release the hostages it had taken on October 7. And yet while I saw innumerable demonstrations and protests against Israel, demanding a halt to the bombings, I saw very few demonstrations asking Hamas to release the innocent hostages.
This love for the terrorists of Hamas continues. As late as a week ago there were pro Hamas demonstrations in New York City. Finally the new Mayor Zohran Mamdani, who is hardly a Zionist reactionary, had to come out and oppose the demonstrations and describe Hamas as terrorist organisation.
I was reminded again of liberal biases when I saw events in Iran unfold over the last month. You don’t have to be an anti Muslim bigot to recognise that the Iranian regime represents a return to a dark medieval era where primitive religious fundamentalists ran society and where women were treated as less than fully human. Any protest against the regime is surely to be welcomed as a call for a move to the 21st Century.
But, as the protests gathered steam last December they were downplayed by mainstream media, especially in the West. What little we knew about them came from social media. (Even that may be a problem now because the regime has restricted internet access.)
By the time that global media was forced to take note the protests had spread to smaller cities and the regime had responded with great brutality.
And yet, there were signs that what was happening was unprecedented. Photographs of gestures of defiance and protests against Iran’s Supreme Bigot, the ruling Ayatollah almost broke the internet.
But still, the media responses were muted. As the author JK Rowling tweeted: “If you claim to support human rights yet can’t bring yourself to show solidarity with those fighting for their liberty in Iran, you’ve revealed yourself. You don’t give a damn about people being oppressed and brutalised so long as it’s being done by the enemies of your enemies.”
The tide now seems to be turning.
The revolts in Iran are too massive to be ignored. But you have to ask yourself: why did it take so long?
I think that as liberals we have fallen into the trap of dividing the world into good guys and bad guys; into victims and aggressors. In fact, if history has taught us anything, it is that there are no good guys and bad guys; just good principles and bad principles.
Sadly we have forgotten this. And that accounts for our moral confusion today.
Name:
E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
Friend's Name:
Friend's E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
Additional Text:
Security code:
Other Articles
-
It is not only the right thing to do on an intuitive level but also entirely in accordance with the principles on which this nation was founded.
-
My point is that in a country as large as ours, a numbers game makes no sense unless you look at the larger picture.
-
It is tempting to see the revolt as a failure because Pawar got nothing of consequence in Delhi. But it would be a mistake to do so.
-
This was an unnecessary reshuffle, forced on the nation by Manmohan Singh’s unwillingness to hold on to the finance portfolio.
-
And the end has an emotional power that is unusual for comic book pictures. What a pity it is the last movie in this trilogy!
See All