Vir Sanghvi
Website  Google.com
   

Greed never pays, hard work is the only answer


Posted By: Vir Sanghvi   |   Posted On: 15 May 2010 05:23 PM

On Friday, Oliver Stone’s sequel to Wall Street premiered at the Cannes film festival. Readers of a certain age may remember the first Wall Street, which came out 23 years ago and starred Michael Douglas as Gordon Gekko, a ruthless financier who gave suspenders a bad name.

 

   One of the pivotal moments in the first film was a scene where Gekko strides through an admiring audience at a shareholders meeting, delivering his mantra: ‘Greed is good.’ That one phrase captured the ethos of Wall Street and of the culture the film was trying to attack.

 

   In fact, that phrase did not spring from Stone’s imagination. Gekko’s intervention at the shareholder’s meeting was stolen from speeches made by Ivan Boesky, routinely described by the press as a ‘Wall Street raider’ who preached that capitalism was predicated on greed and that this was a good thing. (Eventually, the real Boesky and the fictional Gekko both went to jail for fraud.)

 

   When the first Wall Street movie came out, India was in the midst of a mini-stock market boom. Till 1985, the stock market had been far removed from the consciousness of most middle-class Indians. But it suddenly began to be perceived as the perfect route to instant prosperity. You would see secretaries coming into work, clutching forms for Initial Public Offerings (IPOs). Tip sheets masquerading as newspapers were hawked on the streets of Nariman Point and the middle class suddenly went stock-market crazy.

 

   Like many journos of my generation, I remain mystified by the stock market and its machinations. But even then it struck me that a philosophy that advocated greed could not be good for emerging India. Of course, I recognised that the market had an important role to play in mobilising resources and I accepted that there was money to be made in stocks.

 

   But what worried me about the ethos of the stock market boom was its central message: you can get rich by doing nothing.

 

   Wall Street had been intended by Oliver Stone as an attack on the culture of greed. Instead, in America at least, it had the opposite effect. Gekko became a role model for many young people and the movie managed to make the dull business of trading stocks and shares seem glamorous and sexy.

 

   For a long time, I wondered if India would follow the American example. In the early 90s, there was an even bigger boom in the Indian stock market. I watched horrified as people took loans so that they could put money into the stock market. Salaried employees had come to believe that the money they earned from hard work was worthless. The path to immense wealth lay in buying stocks and shares. Greed was good. Hard work was for chumps.

 

"No longer do salaried people dream of getting a 100 per cent return on their investments in a couple of months as they did in the 90s. Instead, we are much more prudent, much more cautious and – well, yes – much more Indian in our approach."

   I wrote about this in Counterpoint at the time. If a society believes that the path to riches lies in buying and selling pieces of paper rather than in making things, I said, then that society is in deep trouble. India could be one of the great success stories of the 21st century. But we could never do it unless we valued hard work and the creation of real wealth.

 

   Events worked to confirm this view. The Harshad Mehta scam led to a collapse in the stock market and many of my colleagues lost their savings. In 1997, the Asian crisis drove home to me how fragile an economic bubble could be. As globalisation gathered pace, we were all at the mercy of the whims and yes, the greed, of global financiers. They could make or break our markets. They could destroy our currencies. And they could take economies from boom to bust.

 

   Now, as I read the commentaries that greet the release of the sequel to the original Wall Street, I can’t help feeling that eventually, India got it right. Despite pressure from the West and the advice of many home-grown pundits, the government refused to embrace globalisation as completely as Wall Street demanded. The fiscal conservatism and the monetary caution that international bankers mocked us for probably saved the Indian economy. As Wall Street led America into its deepest recession, India remained relatively unscathed. In fact, the damage to our economy was almost exactly equal to our exposure to global finance. But because we had refused to be swayed by the cult of easy money and greed, we were immune to the problems that Wall Street caused the rest of the world.

 

   More encouraging, to me at least, was that the middle class saw through the greed-is-good mantra. The stock market has yielded good returns over the last ten years (even the troughs have eventually been smoothed over) and most experts predict that the growth will continue. Last week, I interviewed Deepak Parekh, one of the few financial wizards who always puts the little people first. Deepak believes that it would be foolish not to put a portion of our savings in some market-related instrument or investment.

 

   And yet, despite such powerful encouragement and the prospect of good returns, the Indian middle class has eschewed the get-rich-quick frenzy of the 90s. No longer do salaried people dream of getting a 100 per cent return on their investments in a couple of months as they did in the 90s. Instead, we are much more prudent, much more cautious and – well, yes – much more Indian in our approach. We put our jobs and our careers first. Everything else is just icing on the cake.

 

   America has not been as fortunate. Not only did too many Americans buy shares they could not afford but they were also pushed into taking huge home loans that they could never hope to pay back. The financiers told them not to worry. The value of their homes would soar and they would never have to bother about paying back their loans. These home loans were then secured by Wall Street and when house prices refused to rise as predicted, the entire financial system came tumbling down like a house of cards.

 

   The release of the Wall Street sequel has a special meaning for Americans. In the movie, Gordon Gekko is released from jail and is startled to discover that the excesses of his Wall Street years pale in comparison to what is considered industry practice these days. Greed is not just good, it is a way of life.

 

   For us in India, the sequel holds less meaning. The first Wall Street sent out a message that America ignored. But we listened. We learnt. And we are far better off than much of the world as a consequence.

 

   Because ultimately our Indianness re-asserted itself. Greed never pays. Hard work is the only answer. And in all things, be cautious.


 



Comments

Varun Shekhar
19 Aug 2010


Excellent article by Vir Sanghvi. It's hard to understand some of the negative responses to the article. India has gained by not being too closely tied to international financiers.
Shanty Mathew
31 May 2010

Even Wall Street's regulators and the bankers themselves do not completely understand the complex algorithms and quantitative analyses involved in trading today. To know why these financial products even exist, one must understand their origins (http://www.pbs.org/wnet/ascentofmoney/category/vid). I agree with Vir - although it may seem like generalising - that the key redeeming factor for India is our cynical, overly cautious middle class trusts only 'hard assets'.
Kapil Dalal
25 May 2010

Things like Insider trading and market manipulation by promoters are rampant. Look at the construction sector. Price of real estate just goes up and up- you don't know who are the people who can afford such exorbitant prices. Satyam happened just some time back. I can cite several examples. But point is not to berate India. There is much to be justifiably proud of. However, to assign our relative insulation from the financial crisis to our value system would be silly....contd..
To view all please click on More Comments below

More Comments (14) |   Share with friends   |  
 Post Comment

Your email id will not be published.
Description:

Other Articles

Why is Anil Ambani headline news day after day, week after week?
Why is Parliament disrupted because of the battle? Why is the government of India being forced to defend itself at public fora?
More More
Posted On: 15 Aug 2009
Comments(44)

Pursuits: How much publicity do you give your enemy?
Maoists, Islamists, and fascists have no problem with censorship because they don’t believe in free speech.
More More
Posted On: 31 Oct 2009
Comments(4)

Pursuits: Why are American politicians different from ours?
My theory is that it has to do with the nature of our democracies. The middle class runs America. In India, the middle class has no relevance...
More More
Posted On: 03 Nov 2009
Comments(23)

The media have much to learn from  26/11 -- but so does the government
Whose fault was it that TV served as an impediment in fighting the terrorists? The blame has to be shared by both the TV channels and the government.
More More
Posted On: 24 Nov 2009
Comments(27)

Vinita Kamte’s book exposes the rot at the heart of the police force
Nobody who lives in Bombay can sleep well at night knowing that this is how the police fight terrorism.


More More
Posted On: 14 Dec 2009
Comments(16)

Parallax View
The entire Telengana fiasco tells us something about decision-making in India and about the confusion that envelops our policies on statehood.
More More
Posted On: 26 Dec 2009
Comments(16)

Why is there a move to restore Narasimha Rao’s reputation?
Given this record, why is there a move to restore Narasimha Rao’s reputation? There is no logical explanation.
More More
Posted On: 01 Jan 2010
Comments(53)

Wikipedia is not the most reliable source of information
So why do so many of us depend on a source of information that is so obviously inaccurate? It’s not that we don’t know better.

More More
Posted On: 07 Jan 2010
Comments(30)

The Congress seems less worried by Tharoor’s remarks than the media
Why do you suppose Shashi Tharoor lurches from controversy to controversy? Some of it has to do with his unfamiliarity with the Indian political idiom
More More
Posted On: 13 Jan 2010
Comments(40)

A commitment to modernity is one of the distinguishing features of the Internet generation
There is a new generation out there, expressing itself in ways that were largely unknown even a decade or so ago.
More More
Posted On: 23 Jan 2010
Comments(60)

Husain's conception of artistic freedom
The battle for Indian secularism and free speech must be fought here, in India. And not at the feet of some Middle Eastern monarch.
More More
Posted On: 27 Feb 2010
Comments(149)

Even Congressmen fear that America has too much leverage over India
It is hard to see why Washington is letting the goodwill it has enjoyed in India over the last few years slip through its fingers.
More More
Posted On: 27 Mar 2010
Comments(24)

We need the paramilitary forces just as much as we need the army
The time has come for us to rethink our attitudes to these forces and to care more for those jawans who are left bleeding by India’s internal enemies.
More More
Posted On: 09 Apr 2010
Comments(91)

The real problem is the nexus between politicians and policemen
As long as politicians know that they have policemen and spies who will do their dirty work for them, phone tapping will never end.
More More
Posted On: 29 Apr 2010
Comments(3)

There is a paradox in the way in which the media perceives the UPA government
Now that the UPA has completed the first year of its second term, the mood of the reporting has suddenly changed.
More More
Posted On: 22 May 2010
Comments(9)

Sharad Pawar and the IPL gravy train
If all the teams contain investments from BCCI bigwigs, then clearly, nobody on the board worried unduly about conflict of interest
More More
Posted On: 05 Jun 2010
Comments(10)

Such is the predictability of current events that reporters can sit at home and write stories
When events have this kind of tiresome predictability, I sometimes wonder why we bother to go out and report them.
More More
Posted On: 09 Jul 2010
Comments(12)

Why has the BJP’s response to the Amit Shah case been so disproportionate?
Modi recognises that the Amit Shah case poses an even graver threat to his reputation than the allegations about his role in the Gujarat riots.
More More
Posted On: 30 Jul 2010
Comments(17)

The Pakistani government will be damned before it accepts any help from us
And if this is how their government reacts to an offer of humanitarian aid, then how exactly do we expect Pakistan to react to the peace process?
More More
Posted On: 21 Aug 2010
Comments(11)

Mother Teresa was no saint but she did a lot of good helping those who had lost all hope
The birth centenary of Mother Teresa is an occasion for mixed feelings. But now we are better placed to assess her work and her legacy.
More More
Posted On: 28 Aug 2010
Comments(15)

Sting journalism is already here and the Dark Arts cannot be far behind (NEW)
I have often heard convincing arguments which suggest that both are sometimes required to expose wrong-doing.
More More
Posted On: 07 Sep 2010
Comments(1)




Let's Talk
Let's Talk Will the CWG be a complete disaster - or can things still be salvaged?



Post Your Opinion

Vir Sanghvi


<< Back to Main Page
 
I have A Question For You
Should Suresh Kalmadi resign after the current CWG controversy?



Poll Result
Should Suresh Kalmadi resign after the current CWG controversy?