Ask Vir Ask Vir
banner

Were we too quick to write the obituary of the magazine sector?

Throughout the 1980s, when I was starting out in the magazine business, we had to contend with articles about the

magazine boom in India. In retrospect, it is easy to see why the phenomenon attracted so much attention. In those days, Indian newspapers were godawful: they looked

terrible, they were poorly written and they contained very little news.

 

   The magazines, on the other hand, were full of a younger energy, looked good and read well. Many also broke new ground in terms of the news they covered.

 

   But then, in the early 1990s, a new kind of article began to appear: Is the magazine boom dead?

 

   The broad answer appeared to be: yes. The magazine boom was a creation of its time and many magazines that had been started to fulfill the needs of advertisers and readers in the 1980s had less and less relevance in the 1990s.

 

   I’ll give you the example of Bombay, which I edited when it was launched in 1979. The magazine was a success and continued to do well long after I left. But it was a response to a specific need: the absence of local content in newspapers and the unavailability of colour media targeted at Bombayites for advertisers. Once the newspapers got their acts together and started printing in colour, it was only a matter of time before Bombay folded up, as it did eventually.

 

   But having said that, I question whether the magazine boom ever really ended. When Business India began stumbling (in the face of competition from Business Today and Business World) the sceptics said with new, improved business papers nobody needed business magazines.

 

   Well, guess what? All three of the old business magazines continue to flourish. Outlook Business has been successfully launched. Forbes India does well and Fortune is said to be on its way.

 

   The same goes for people magazines. Everyone warned that Nari Hira’s Society could not last into the new century. But not only does it flourish, there are also many new entrants in that space: Hello, OK, Hi Blitz, People etc.

 

   And what of Femina, the magazine of our parents’ childhood? It has been successfully relaunched and survives in an extremely crowded women’s magazine market. Verve, Vogue, Elle, Marie Claire and God alone knows what else.

 

   Even the newsmagazines survive. We kept being told that no newsmagazine could survive into the new century. Even Time and Newsweek were struggling, they said.

 

"The dramatic growth of the Outlook stable demonstrates that the market for new magazines exists: you just have to know how to address it."

   Well, yes and no. Newsweek continues to fight for survival (the new strategy of cutting circulation is aimed at achieving financial viability) and you don’t see US News and World Report any longer.

 

   But Time makes money. And The Economist is one of the great success stories of the last decade, adding new readers in new countries year after year.

 

   You could argue, in the case of Time (though I am not sure I would agree) that it survived only by dumbing down (in the US). But that explanation hardly applies to The Economist which is what it has always been.

 

   In India, the three top newsmagazines flourish. India Today retains its hold on Middle India, Outlook has an astonishing influence among the chattering classes, and The Week succeeds because of its loyal base of readers in the South.

 

   So, here’s my question: were we too quick to write the obituary of the magazine sector?

 

   My view is that we were. Yes, some magazines were not built to last. But many others could have survived if proprietors had demonstrated imagination and courage. If Filmfare and Femina survive, why did The Illustrated Weekly need to die? It could well have found a new life as a Vanity Fair kind of publication?

 

   In many cases, newspaper managements simply failed to understand how magazines would need to be marketed in this day and age and closed down many of their magazines. But wherever there was a pure magazine publisher, the boom never ended. Aroon Purie defied the sceptics and the Living Media empire kept growing. The dramatic growth of the Outlook stable demonstrates that the market for new magazines exists: you just have to know how to address it.

 

   So, the next time somebody tells you something like ‘newspapers are dead’ or ‘news channels are finished’, treat that pronouncement with a degree of scepticism.

 

   They said that about magazines. And they were wrong.


 

CommentsComments

  • Bob 11 Jan 2011

    There's something about reading a magazine that exceeds reading articles on the web.
    You can take it from the livingroom sofa to the kitchen table and the loo without having to plug anything in, or give it a second thought.
    Having a hard copy of something to read anytime you want is something I fear future generations will be less likely to enjoy.
    You can read a great article while going about your business, but the risk of dropping it into your dinner or the toilet are much greater.

  • naina sethi 18 Dec 2009

    And also, yesterday I was at Barnes and Noble, a book store with great collections of books and magazines. It is the last place where I think I would find an Indian magazine. But yesterday, I found the Indian edition of GQ at that store. I was ecstatic and I could not believe that my first copy of GQ India would be bought at a book store in San Diego.
    Content is being recognized by the market, and that is why they are buying the product.

  • naina sethi 18 Dec 2009

    Of course they aren't dead. I thought they were , but there are not. For instance, I emailed the editor of elle india ( one woman I think every young girl and women should respect- because of her feminist attitude, staunch opinions, and a very strong personality over all ) a few months ago and told her that I thought that the magazine's sales were not doing well. I was gullible and it was weird how my way of thinking about elle india changed in around 5 days. I did not research and did not know that they in fact have a really good ( rather the best ) marketing team of a magazine. I don't like blame games, but for this one, I would like to blame the media and the foolhardiness of the people.

  • To view all please click on More Comments below
More Comments:(4)Posted On: 16 Dec 2009 12:12 PM
Name:
E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
Description:
Security code:
Captcha Enter the code shown above:
 
Name:
E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
Friend's Name:
Friend's E-mail:
Your email id will not be published.
 
The Message text:
Hi!,
This email was created by [your name] who thought you would be interested in the following Article:

A Vir Sanghvi Article Information
https://www.virsanghvi.com/Article-Details.aspx?key=405

The Vir Sanghvi also contains hundreds of articles.

Additional Text:
Security code:
Captcha Enter the code shown above:
 

CommentsOther Articles

See All

Ask VirRead all

Connect with Virtwitter

@virsanghvi on
twitter.com
Vir Sanghvi